Why Baldur’s Gate 3’s Evil Playthrough Feels So Unrewarding


Highlights of the story

  • Baldur’s Gate 3’s Evil playthrough feels a little weak, especially compared to the great base game.
  • Players miss out on numerous NPC interactions and entire quest lines by choosing to take the wrong path.
  • As an alternative, they only get a handful of new interactions and an additional companion, Manthara.

Baldur’s Gate 3 has been received Widely acclaimed by both critics and fans, and for good reason. The game offers its players an almost ridiculous amount of creative choice, giving them the ability to tackle their various encounters as they see fit. Take the first centroid, The Emerald Grove, as an example. There’s so much story and interaction in just this small area, that you’ll likely miss a ton during your first playthrough.

Keep in mind, though, that this is all highly intentional. The developer behind it, Running Studioshas deliberately worked to enrich the game. Thousands upon thousands of interactions. It may feel overwhelming at first, but it’s what gives the game its charm, and its replayability factor. However, despite all these opportunities, there is one essential element that feels sorely missing.

And it’s a fitting one Devilish game. In a game that offers so much to players who want to shape their destiny, anyone who chooses to go completely evil during their run is severely punished in a number of ways. What’s worse is that the game fails to compensate for the damage you take simply because of choosing evil, resulting in a fairly lackluster experience overall.

Forced to a hard path

Baldur’s Gate 3 characters can describe themselves in many ways. You will have magical magicians who love the Goddess. And with a strange intimacy with blood-sucking vampire bears. But here’s the thing. Those who wish to follow the evil path in the play usually have to make a very important decision in Act 1: and that is Beating the Emerald Grove.

You see, while you can still stick around, doing bad things every now and then, this critical encounter serves as the bread and butter of most badass playthroughs. This is because it allows you to recruit. The mantra, which is just about a new companion you meet during an Evil Run. Here’s the problem though. The fact that the game differentiates between evil and non-evil is so largely understated. A ton of player agency.

Droids in the grove at Baldur’s Gate 3.

Players are trying to do everything they can to somehow get Manthara, without completely slaughtering the entire Guru. From Even mods for glitches, It has been tried and tested. You might be thinking, “What’s wrong with killing a bunch of Druids and Tieflings?” This is considered a bad playthrough after all. Well, as it turns out, this is one of the things the game actually decides to punish you for.

Evil comes at a price.

Baldur’s Gate 3 gives players the ability to make thousands of choices during each playthrough. But more often than not, choosing the legitimate good in general comes along. Very few results. In fact, you are often rewarded for your bravery, by being able to add new allies to your party. This is true, even after the initial cast of adventures you meet.

But that’s not all. Being a good person usually gets you more friends and allies in the world as well. Going back to Druid Grove for a second. You’ll want to stick around and familiarize yourself with all the people there. Because chances are you’ll run into them later in the game, as you step into Acts 2 and 3. By choosing to kill them in the groove, you’re killing a lot of things prematurely. Story and interactions.

And worst of all, the game fails to add anything new to replace these interactions. This makes parts of the game feel incredibly hollow, whereas normally, you have characters returning and continuing your journey with you. If you had a new set this wouldn’t be a problem. Only evil-driven characters with you. But this is not the only case.

Evil is extremely unhelpful in BG3. WARNING TO PLAYERS.
by thein/Drillerlake IBaldursGate3

In fact, some players have even reported that their playing time has decreased that much on a bad run. 40 hours. This is despite Baldur’s Gate 3 offering, on average, 75 hours of content for its players. But of course this is not too surprising. After all, all the characters you’re supposed to present are already dead in Act 1 if you decide to turn evil.

Take it Barcos route For example from Act 1. While seemingly just an annoying gnome you’re likely to kill during a bad run, he’s part of a larger quest line that continues into the game’s third act. The game has a great tendency for characters to return in later parts of the game. And so, killing them like a killing spree does nothing but distract from your own experience.

Barcus Wroot joins your camp if you rescue him in Baldur’s Gate 3.

Losing to close allies

It gets a lot worse. Turns out, being evil doesn’t just mean that some NPCs will disappear in later stages of the game. In fact, even your own party members will turn against you. Especially, Wild And Karlach will refuse to continue the journey with you. Even Gale takes a little persuading to keep going after the whole fiasco.

It’s not much of a surprise why their characters wouldn’t be willing to wantonly kill innocents. But as a player, you can’t help but feel disappointed to see them go. Both Wyll and Karlach have amazing interactions and stories that last into the late stages of the game. Losing them as early as Grove can not only deprive you of content but can Seriously weaken your party.. you are better Kill them yourself.

hit the garden, You also never get recruited Hilsin At your party he is a major character in Act 2, including Thaniel Coastline, and curse. Without Halson’s presence, it is likely that players will never understand the source behind the curse, or even come close to solving it. In the end, this is another aspect of the game that you give up for being bad.

Of course, losing all those allies starts to affect your ability to hold your own in combat as well. Depending on what difficulty you’re playing, that has a wide range of access. letters And Abilities A very important positive. But if you’ve taken out too many party members by becoming a killjoy, you’ll find yourself traveling the streets of Farron on your own.

Luckily, played Rental system This makes it so you’re not completely without options. So it’s not like you’ll be taking yourself out of the game entirely. But even then, that doesn’t make up for the dozens of unique items, vendors, and questlines you still lose during an Evil playthrough without a replacement.

The Manthara Factor

It’s pretty clear that with what you want to lose during an Evil playthrough of Baldur’s Gate 3, it ultimately comes down to how much you want Manthara in your party. He’s the only real trade-off to go to evil, because he’s the only part of the game. Mostly closed For legitimate good characters. So whether you think it’s worthwhile to go Evil in the game or not, it entirely depends on how nuts you are for Manthara.

And honestly? The game didn’t exactly make a good case for it. For one, thousands of his dialogues were completely missing from the game. it was Thanks to a bug Which plagued the game for a few weeks after release. After Lauren fixes it, players realize that Manthara makes you a little emotional each time. And for what it’s worth, he has one. The Great Redemption.

Manthara after Baldur’s redemption in Gate 3.

Manthara goes from being an Absolute cultist to someone who wants to destroy the Absolute for what they did to him. She’s an interesting character, especially because she still has a sense of power within her, making her a fun ally for evil playthroughs. But it really doesn’t need to be said, that Just doesn’t make up For everything you lose along the way.

Dozens of NPCs and their interactions. Entire questlines. Karlach, Weil and Halson. Not to mention, you won’t be very likely to get recruited. Jaheera either. A lot is taken away from players if they decide to follow the dark path. But hey, maybe Manthara is enough to make you jump regardless. But for most players, It’s just not a realistic or worthwhile trade-off..

Stick to being bad in repeat playthroughs

With how the game is designed, it really feels like Lauren wanted players to try to completely eliminate evil in a second, or third playthrough. It’s like a great alternative to the game for those who want to get some new interactions and don’t mind missing out on some big parts of the game because they’ve already played it.

In this case, missing out on characters like Karlach and Weil doesn’t seem too bad, since the assumption is that you already have their individual stories. First playthrough. But for anyone who wants to jump straight into the game as the bad guy, well, Baldur’s Gate 3 might just annoy you. Sure, the game still offers one An abundance of content as a baseline. And even with all that you lose, He will still be there.

But prepare to be a little. Out of the loop When people discuss sports. They can talk about an interesting story or character interaction from Act 3. Only for you to realize that it involves a character you unceremoniously killed in Act 1. This is one of the things that can make the game feel a little off. influenced byDespite the sheer amount of content and quality it offers overall.

Was this article helpful?

Thanks! Share your feedback with us. ⚡

How can we improve this post? Help us. ✍

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here